<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Rethinking exclusion of alias from &#8220;all&#8221;</title>
	<link>http://www.kimchy.org/rethinking-exclusion-of-alias-from-all/</link>
	<description>Here we go. Here comes the Prozac</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 18:27:06 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: Lukáš Vlček</title>
		<link>http://www.kimchy.org/rethinking-exclusion-of-alias-from-all/#comment-3767</link>
		<author>Lukáš Vlček</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2008 18:18:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.kimchy.org/rethinking-exclusion-of-alias-from-all/#comment-3767</guid>
		<description>The best solution would be to make very clear statement about this topic in the documentation (probably with some nice examples). Then it really does not matter what is the default value. I can imagine that the turn-on/off really depends on the use case. For example with cook book application it is not that useful to return all ingredients as a response to 'ingredient' user query (assuming that each Receipt object will have some property of List) - thus it is OK to turn it off. However, with HR application it make sense to return list of all managers as a response to 'manager' user query. Just my 2 cents.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The best solution would be to make very clear statement about this topic in the documentation (probably with some nice examples). Then it really does not matter what is the default value. I can imagine that the turn-on/off really depends on the use case. For example with cook book application it is not that useful to return all ingredients as a response to &#8216;ingredient&#8217; user query (assuming that each Receipt object will have some property of List) - thus it is OK to turn it off. However, with HR application it make sense to return list of all managers as a response to &#8216;manager&#8217; user query. Just my 2 cents.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shay Banon</title>
		<link>http://www.kimchy.org/rethinking-exclusion-of-alias-from-all/#comment-3764</link>
		<author>Shay Banon</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2008 15:29:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.kimchy.org/rethinking-exclusion-of-alias-from-all/#comment-3764</guid>
		<description>It is optional, and can be controlled using a flag. The question is what the flag default will be. To include or not to include (the alias), that is the question.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is optional, and can be controlled using a flag. The question is what the flag default will be. To include or not to include (the alias), that is the question.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mario Mendez</title>
		<link>http://www.kimchy.org/rethinking-exclusion-of-alias-from-all/#comment-3763</link>
		<author>Mario Mendez</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2008 15:21:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.kimchy.org/rethinking-exclusion-of-alias-from-all/#comment-3763</guid>
		<description>I think this feature is useful in some circumstances, maybe it could be optional.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think this feature is useful in some circumstances, maybe it could be optional.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
