<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: To Groovy Or JRuby</title>
	<link>http://www.kimchy.org/to_groovy_or_jruby/</link>
	<description>Here we go. Here comes the Prozac</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 09:50:10 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: M Easter</title>
		<link>http://www.kimchy.org/to_groovy_or_jruby/#comment-308</link>
		<author>M Easter</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jun 2007 17:12:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.kimchy.org/to_groovy_or_jruby/#comment-308</guid>
		<description>Yes, the best answer may well be "learn both".

Yet another answer may be "it doesn't matter, as long as you learn _one_".  

It may simply be too early to predict which one will pay dividends, but it is certainly true that a person will benefit their career and passion for software by delving into either Groovy or JRuby.  Flip a coin and go for it!

I am less enthused by the other options, including Jython (sad to say... I love it and Python).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, the best answer may well be &#8220;learn both&#8221;.</p>
<p>Yet another answer may be &#8220;it doesn&#8217;t matter, as long as you learn _one_&#8221;.  </p>
<p>It may simply be too early to predict which one will pay dividends, but it is certainly true that a person will benefit their career and passion for software by delving into either Groovy or JRuby.  Flip a coin and go for it!</p>
<p>I am less enthused by the other options, including Jython (sad to say&#8230; I love it and Python).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Black</title>
		<link>http://www.kimchy.org/to_groovy_or_jruby/#comment-175</link>
		<author>David Black</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 May 2007 10:05:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.kimchy.org/to_groovy_or_jruby/#comment-175</guid>
		<description>And its worth noting that as regards IDE integration the latest stable development builds of the Groovy+Eclipse plugin are now very usable (I know, I'm using it every day) and getting more and more functional very rapidly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And its worth noting that as regards IDE integration the latest stable development builds of the Groovy+Eclipse plugin are now very usable (I know, I&#8217;m using it every day) and getting more and more functional very rapidly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Black</title>
		<link>http://www.kimchy.org/to_groovy_or_jruby/#comment-174</link>
		<author>David Black</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 May 2007 09:59:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.kimchy.org/to_groovy_or_jruby/#comment-174</guid>
		<description>Groovy every day of the week and twice on Sundays. The fundamental premise of Ruby was flawed i.e. we don't want to leverage Java, Java has become too bloated. Nonsense of course, Groovy is superior by design because it was conceived correctly - the whole point is that people want to leverage Java. Groovy has everything Ruby has and more but without that fundamental flaw. Now we see JRuby basically admitting the mistake and attempting to graft Ruby onto the JVM and to work with Java. But it can never do so as well as Groovy which started from this premise. JRuby is just a poor Groovy, why bother?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Groovy every day of the week and twice on Sundays. The fundamental premise of Ruby was flawed i.e. we don&#8217;t want to leverage Java, Java has become too bloated. Nonsense of course, Groovy is superior by design because it was conceived correctly - the whole point is that people want to leverage Java. Groovy has everything Ruby has and more but without that fundamental flaw. Now we see JRuby basically admitting the mistake and attempting to graft Ruby onto the JVM and to work with Java. But it can never do so as well as Groovy which started from this premise. JRuby is just a poor Groovy, why bother?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Leonardo Soto</title>
		<link>http://www.kimchy.org/to_groovy_or_jruby/#comment-173</link>
		<author>Leonardo Soto</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 May 2007 04:40:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.kimchy.org/to_groovy_or_jruby/#comment-173</guid>
		<description>Jython is a pretty solid scripting language for the JVM too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jython is a pretty solid scripting language for the JVM too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: iznobad</title>
		<link>http://www.kimchy.org/to_groovy_or_jruby/#comment-172</link>
		<author>iznobad</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 May 2007 12:48:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.kimchy.org/to_groovy_or_jruby/#comment-172</guid>
		<description>For me, groovy is more attractive for performance reasons. Both languages seem good, but I'm a speed nut, and simple can't stand the slow speed of the ruby interpreter.
Yes, I know there are things in the works to improve ruby speed (compiler and/or specializer), but they're not here yet
Jruby is interpreted too, it's not compiled code.

Groovy can be compiled and performance is pretty close to java. As far as I can gather it's like 80% or more of java's speed when running similar code on the same JVM.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For me, groovy is more attractive for performance reasons. Both languages seem good, but I&#8217;m a speed nut, and simple can&#8217;t stand the slow speed of the ruby interpreter.<br />
Yes, I know there are things in the works to improve ruby speed (compiler and/or specializer), but they&#8217;re not here yet<br />
Jruby is interpreted too, it&#8217;s not compiled code.</p>
<p>Groovy can be compiled and performance is pretty close to java. As far as I can gather it&#8217;s like 80% or more of java&#8217;s speed when running similar code on the same JVM.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.kimchy.org/to_groovy_or_jruby/#comment-171</link>
		<author>Anonymous</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 May 2007 14:27:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.kimchy.org/to_groovy_or_jruby/#comment-171</guid>
		<description>Javascript. Sun is including it in Java 6.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Javascript. Sun is including it in Java 6.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andres Almiray</title>
		<link>http://www.kimchy.org/to_groovy_or_jruby/#comment-170</link>
		<author>Andres Almiray</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 May 2007 03:02:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.kimchy.org/to_groovy_or_jruby/#comment-170</guid>
		<description>I'm a Groovy fan but this time I think the soundest counsel comes from Charles Nutter, try them both. If you have acces to the books (Groovy:GINA, Ruby:the pickaxe) then you'll have an easier and happ experience.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m a Groovy fan but this time I think the soundest counsel comes from Charles Nutter, try them both. If you have acces to the books (Groovy:GINA, Ruby:the pickaxe) then you&#8217;ll have an easier and happ experience.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul King</title>
		<link>http://www.kimchy.org/to_groovy_or_jruby/#comment-169</link>
		<author>Paul King</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 May 2007 00:03:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.kimchy.org/to_groovy_or_jruby/#comment-169</guid>
		<description>&gt; There is no publicly viewable language reference, so you never quite know what is right and wrong.
True, but the same applies for all other JVM scripting languages at present.

&gt; The books describe outdated versions of the language.
Groovy in Action describes the latest 1.0 (non-beta) release

&gt; Grails is indeed impressive, but I am not confident that it is built upon a solid foundation.
It really depends if you think Hibernate and Spring are a good foundation or not.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>> There is no publicly viewable language reference, so you never quite know what is right and wrong.<br />
True, but the same applies for all other JVM scripting languages at present.</p>
<p>> The books describe outdated versions of the language.<br />
Groovy in Action describes the latest 1.0 (non-beta) release</p>
<p>> Grails is indeed impressive, but I am not confident that it is built upon a solid foundation.<br />
It really depends if you think Hibernate and Spring are a good foundation or not.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Calvin Yu</title>
		<link>http://www.kimchy.org/to_groovy_or_jruby/#comment-168</link>
		<author>Calvin Yu</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 May 2007 20:31:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.kimchy.org/to_groovy_or_jruby/#comment-168</guid>
		<description>I would say to learn Ruby/JRuby, and the reason has nothing to do with the technical details.  You said it yourself, Groovy grew out of Java, so the learning curve is easier.  In a way, you can say you learn less by learning Groovy.  Ruby, having not grew out of Java, has a different way of doing things, so you do stand to learn more.

If you're looking at learning something that will give you a different perspective on programming try Ruby.  If you're looking on something that might nicely compliment your skill set, Groovy might be a better option.

Calvin</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would say to learn Ruby/JRuby, and the reason has nothing to do with the technical details.  You said it yourself, Groovy grew out of Java, so the learning curve is easier.  In a way, you can say you learn less by learning Groovy.  Ruby, having not grew out of Java, has a different way of doing things, so you do stand to learn more.</p>
<p>If you&#8217;re looking at learning something that will give you a different perspective on programming try Ruby.  If you&#8217;re looking on something that might nicely compliment your skill set, Groovy might be a better option.</p>
<p>Calvin</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Emmanuel Pirsch</title>
		<link>http://www.kimchy.org/to_groovy_or_jruby/#comment-167</link>
		<author>Emmanuel Pirsch</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 May 2007 19:14:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.kimchy.org/to_groovy_or_jruby/#comment-167</guid>
		<description>Follow the red rabbit (link) below for my take on the subject... Basically, I like JRuby... But as Charles Nutter said... "don't let anyone make the choice for you."</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Follow the red rabbit (link) below for my take on the subject&#8230; Basically, I like JRuby&#8230; But as Charles Nutter said&#8230; &#8220;don&#8217;t let anyone make the choice for you.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
